WashingtonPresident Donald Trump is targeting organizations that assist transgender youngsters and immigrants by transforming a student loan cancelation program into what some worry will be used as a political retaliation tool.
Public Service Loan Forgiveness enables government workers, including teachers, firefighters, and many nonprofit personnel, to have their student loan balances forgiven after ten years of on-time payments. The U.S. education secretary will make the final decision, but the Education Department is working on a reform that would deny benefits to groups engaged in unlawful activity. The department has published a draft proposal that includes categories of prohibited action that focus on transgender, immigration, and terrorism issues.
The department would have subjective authority to determine whether an organization is involved in any criminal activity, which could be used to exclude entire hospital systems or state governments from the program, according to a number of advocates who were asked to comment on the draft proposal.
According to Betsy Mayotte, president of the Institute of Student Loan Advisors and one of the advocates who requested that the policy be reviewed as part of a rulemaking process, “that’s definitely an indicator for me that this is politically motivated and perhaps will be used as a tool for political punishment.”
Many could be denied loan relief by the plan.
The program has erased loans for over 1 million Americans, including park rangers, college employees, and nurses.
The initiative was established by Congress in 2007 to entice recent college graduates to work in the public sector, which frequently offers lower compensation than for-profit businesses. After borrowers make 120 monthly loan payments while employed by any level of government, the program guarantees to eliminate any outstanding debt. Nonprofit organizations are currently also qualified if they concentrate on specific fields, such as public interest law, public health, or education.
Some of the NGOs that offer funds to transgender adolescents and their families so they can visit states that allow gender-affirming care for minors are currently included in a government directory of qualified nonprofits. Some that offer legal assistance to immigrants irrespective of their legal status are also included.
In March, Trump ordered modifications to the program after claiming it had misappropriated government cash to support national security-compromising activist groups. He ordered the Education Department to eliminate groups involved in criminal activity, specifically targeting those that assist immigrants, transgender children, or promote terrorism—a term he frequently uses to describe pro-Palestinian activists.
His proposal might prevent a significant number of student loan debtors from having their loans cancelled. People who work for an ineligible employer would be forced to find another job or sacrifice loan forgiveness because they would no longer be able to move closer to cancellation.
Nonprofits, schools, and hospitals may be in danger.
Trump’s criteria of unlawful activities are essentially reflected in the proposal. These include supporting any group classified as a foreign terrorist organization and “aiding or abetting” violations of federal immigration law. Violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which Trump administration officials have cited to undermine diversity, fairness, and inclusion initiatives, are also included on the list.
Engaging in the chemical and surgical castration or mutilation of minors in contravention of federal or state legislation is also regarded as unlawful. It states that this covers the use of medications that postpone puberty or hormone therapy. Children are defined as individuals under the age of 19.
There are worries that if one department offers specific care to transgender adolescents, entire hospital systems may lose their eligibility. Similarly, entire communities that restrict collaboration with federal immigration agents may be denied the benefit by the federal government.
Alyssa Dobson, a member of the rulemaking panel and the director of financial aid at Slippery Rock University, stated, “I could see entire cities and entire civil structures being targeted.” According to her, it might also provide the administration with an additional weapon in its fight against colleges that don’t align with the president’s political views.
According to them, this might regrettably enable them to pursue the unwanted institutions even more, she said.
The department’s plan would include court rulings and other legal findings when deciding whether an employer should be considered ineligible. However, it allows for a certain amount of subjectivity, allowing the education secretary to omit groups without requiring evidence of a conviction or settlement.
The Education Department reported that only one negotiator objected to the proposal. Although they voted in support of changes they believed enhanced the rule, a number of negotiators on the rulemaking panel stated that they disagreed with the plan.
According to a spokesman for the Education Department, the department has a duty to stop illegal behavior and make sure that firms participating in the PSLF program are not involved in criminal activity.
The concept of criminal action is ambiguous, according to advocates.
According to Emeka Oguh, CEO of PeopleJoy, a company that assists companies in providing student loan relief, if the policy is implemented widely, it may exacerbate the lack of physicians and nurses. As a panelist, he urged the Education Department to exercise the authority strategically, targeting specific hospital departments rather than entire systems.
According to Oguh, department representatives were unable to name any organizations that might be discovered to be engaged in unlawful activity. When asked for specifics, officials stated that treating an immigrant in the country illegally would not be regarded as a crime. How the agency would deal with educators or schools that taught DEI curriculum was less clear.
According to Oguh, there was a lot of uncertainty there.
Others expressed disapproval of a clause requiring employers to attest that they don’t commit crimes. In addition to making an organization ineligible, failure to certify could put a large number of borrowers at danger of cancellation due to procedural issues.
The agency stated that it is willing to make adjustments in response to the panel’s concerns. In the end, it is free to modify the plan as it sees fit. The agency is currently working on a formal plan, which will be subject to public discussion before being completed. It is anticipated to go into force in July 2026.
The Education Department expressed gratitude to the experts last week, stating that they helped carry out one of President Trump’s pledges to make sure PSLF doesn’t support illegal organizations.
___
Several private foundations provide funding for the Associated Press’s educational coverage. All content is the exclusive responsibility of AP. Visit AP.org to view the guidelines for AP when working with philanthropies, as well as a list of funded coverage areas and supporters.
